不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

请问May老师，条件1是对的吗？谢谢！

请May老师作答。我算出来是330/7，不知道对不对。

请问May老师，这道题应该选什么？谢谢

请问May 老师，应该选哪个？谢谢

请问May 老师，条件1是对的吗？

老师，请问这道题选什么？

老师，请问这道题选什么？

这道题怎样缩放老师

老师，请问这道题E为什么不对？为什么要用there is?不理解。

请问老师，选哪个?