不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

第二个式子，我认为是 n=100K+67, 为什么是n=100k+63

我觉得应该选C

这个怎么化简？

英吉老师 这个选啥 好像没看到视频里讲 麻烦解释一下哈 谢谢老师

请陆旭老师回答一下。 这个题用picking numbers解答是最佳最快方案嘛？ 如果picking numbers的话，咋样想到啊？如果推理的话，应该怎么考虑呢？