Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

PS：问49.987*9.879／0.253化简结果最接近哪一个？ 选项a.b.c忘记了，d是1700，e是1800

数学书60页32题，有多少小于20的正整数等于3的正倍数与4的正倍数只和，答案说10个，我怎么查都是11个

PS：一个数是两位数，这个数大于11，个位数和十位数加起来的和是质数，问这样的 数有多少个？

57)If m is a positive odd integer between 2 and 30, then m is divisible by how many different positive prime numbers? 1)m is not divisible by 3. 2)m is not divisible by 5. 条件1 我理解的是 M 只能2到30之间，那么就有5，7，11，13，17，19，23，29，这么多个prime numbers. 条件2 我理解的是 M 可以是 3，7，9，11，13，17，19，21，23，27，29 这些，21可以被3和7除， 我判断条件1完全可以，条件2 我不太确定

62)if d is the positive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers what is the value of d? (1) 10d is a factor of f. (2) d > 6 这个题目说d 是一个正整数，f 是30！阶乘，d的值多少， 这个题应该怎么推理？

DS：说一个整数N，最大不超过50，把从1到N的所有数拉出来列一起，数字里出现4的数字有几个？ 条件1：这些数里出现0的个数是出现4的个数的数字少11； 条件2：说N这个数是某个prime number的平方

错选了D，麻烦老师分析一下这题的时态！

错选了最后一个，麻烦老师讲解一下！

老师麻烦讲解这道题 Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance. A has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided B there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided C general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided D lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided E is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides

讲解～