Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

这个是怎么算的，我只能看出要求的人数是总人数的百分之三

这题除了试数还有什么好方法吗？如果试数的话，如何快速找到适合的数呢？

条件二说的是每一项Sn都大于5吗？，但是n/（n+1）不是小于1吗？我不知道该怎么理解和使用该条件

条件2是要把对角线为8时的情况算出来吗？如果不是，应该怎么判断吗？另外五边形的面积应该怎么算呢？

这题怎么思考？还有绝对值不等式的考点有哪些啊

B单独不能成立吗？k=7带入不等式中，不是可以限制m和n的范围吗

题干不是已经能排出+和➗好了吗？因为此时式子没有意义。那两个条件为什么不能单独成立呢？这题的逻辑是什么

条件2为什么单独不成立？B做了超过50%，说明B比A效率高，那么3小时内可以完成

已知由一个符号@表示的加减乘除中的一一个符号。如果a@ (-a) =0,那么a=0.问:以下条件能否判断符号@是加减乘除中的哪一个?条件1).其中a@(a@a)=0, a=0;条件2).其中a@(b@c)=(a@b)@c. 答案：E

老师这道题和后面你讲的6和4的例子没看懂！