Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

请陆旭老师回答一下。我觉得B和E都挺对的，因为都说了such labour怎样，和需要填空之前的内容关系非常密切。感谢老师解答！

请陆旭老师回答一下。请问这一题为什么选D。D选项没怎么看懂，然后我选了E。

请问陆旭老师，这道题我在网上找不到，不知道来源，只好贴上。这个CR正确选项D，没有过度推理吗？如果只是大众知道这个鸟有药用价值，不一定引发偷猎吧？C我反而觉得更直接削弱逻辑链：这个鸟住在palm tree上，森林区片化减少了鸟的数量。C：fragmentation 使palm tree 长得更好了，很直接地作用于这个逻辑链啊。我想不通为什么您上课说D更直接？或者您认为削弱题目给出一个他因是一种非常直接的削弱方法，优先于对原文给出原因提出质疑？

@Tina老师，我想问您一下关于跳读的事儿。我一直比较纠结😣 我觉得对于长文章跳读是抓主旨，然后题目问到细节时再回读原文。可是我做细节题的时候再回来看原文的时候，就发现跟原文那个框架逻辑连不上了，没有一遍我都读下来我理的细节和框架之间的关系清。还有的细节题我如果第一遍不全读时就找不到定位的位置，内心就会很急躁，第一遍读了的话，我可能看到那个题目问细节就会直接有反应，但也可能因为模糊记忆而出错。但是有些难文章，我如果都读的话，就是细节也没看懂，主旨也会读的糊涂 老师，我这种情况是不是应该还是把全文都看了呀，如果细节我发现乱乱的话，再不读？您有什么好的建议么？

@Tina老师，老师，A和E您讲完我觉得确实E的语意更好。但是E的修饰as the first American women那里我觉得有问题。前面的Dr那个人是一个定语，可以被那个as…那个短语修饰到么？就被我直接排除了，求老师解答。

@Tina老师，老师，这道题我明白AB的surely语意不太好。但我不明白CDE里面该怎么选。我觉得c选项，as much technological as 没有DE明确的 technological infrastructure和 economic infrastructure这样比直接。C选项是什么和什么比吖？DE为什么被排除了呢？谢谢老师！

@Tina老师，老师这道题我AC选项当时纠结选了C。觉得A原文只是说吃油是导致diseases的原因，没说是不是主要。C选项说的比较含糊，说这个inflammation和是一种反应，这种反应和immune 系统有关。我觉得c挺好的，为什么不对呢？

@Tina老师，老师我主要想问您一下C和E选项。C选项的claim是只表示观点的意思不能指事实么？E选项我排除是因为后半部分。conclusion about a predicted bad effect of the policy. 是怎么理解鸭，B2是批评critics的。我觉得critics是说的关于这个政策的坏影响（不好的地方）。所以把E排除了。麻烦老师帮忙解答。

@Tina，老师，我想问您这道题AB选项，应该用have shown 还是have been shown 吖，还是说主被动都可以呢。我觉得have shown读的挺顺的。英吉老师说since跟前面都previous形成反差，我觉得也有道理，但我做题时没想出来这点。

@Tina老师，老师，我想问一下这道题的b和c选项，我没有太理解