Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

老师请问这个问题如何解答

请Tina老师讲解。这个题目问法第一次遇到，说下面哪个不是削弱。这种问法相当于在问哪个是支持或者无关吗？做题时觉得AB都是与原文逻辑无关选项。CDE都在解释一个城市与另一个相比，心脏相关手术的成本因素不同，感觉都与原文相关，但是也不是削弱。这个题目感觉摸不着方向

请王文静老师解答。我理的逻辑链：因为热的地方容易缺水，且全球变暖让温度更高，所以肾结石病会增加。我选的E，说天气热的地方结石病多，冷的地方少。A选项给我感觉是因果倒置，病多的地方，天气热，反了。请老师讲解这个题的正确解题思路，并且指出我的错误在哪，如何避免

C选项的It为什么是指代不清呀

金老师好，当时看B觉得to conquer 的发起者是登山者，不应是hazards，但是根据including觉得是hazards包括这几个事，E从语法上成了amateur including了，这个Ving找动作发起者的规则这里不适用吗？

请老师讲一下思路

请老师讲下第七题思路。我的理解是条件1可以判断，想要成立则xy的个位数应该是5或者0，这样次方之后依然是5或者0，即xy的个位应该相等，所以答案是No。老师，我是错误理解题意了吗？

徐老师讲下第六题，是用捆绑法吗？做这种题特别没有思路，怎么办？

求问解题思路

请问这两题的解题思路