According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin，the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago，at the end of the Pleistocene era，can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans，i.e.，the Paleoindians， who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However，anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them.Nor were extinctions confined to large animals： small animals，plants，and insects disappeared，presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still，Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians，arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere.But，according to historian Richard White，even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species，and Krech，though aware that the dates are controversial，does not challenge them；yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago. 　3. In the last sentence of the passage， the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 27-30) most probably in order to 　　(A) Refute White's suggestion that neither Martin nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians' contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions 　　(B) Cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming 　　(C) Suggest that Martin's， Krech's， and White's theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question 　　(D) Call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions 　　(E) Provide support for White's questioning of both Martin's and Krech's positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions 老师，我在做这道题的时候，首先定位到最后一句觉得没说什么重点，就有个yet转折，可能这是用来驳斥前面的某些观点的。所以看选项找有没有驳斥的意思的， 发现5个选项全都在驳斥。。。心里慌了往前找。再回去找的时候时间已到。我就随便选了个B（时间一到各种混乱），因为在做这篇文章之前，我大体看了下原文，记住了原文讲的是P反驳M，W反驳P。后来答案我也看明白了，我认为我做这道题的思路出现了偏差，我想问一下应该怎么修正。

王文静老师您好！这道题目我看不出考点，我做题的思路一个是conclude后面跟by还是with，没想到可以to。然后impose不知道是哪个形式比较好？求老师指教

王文静老师您好，这道题目我做题的时候看到了and想到了可能是考平行，但是我记得之前做题好像and后面再加that的话句子算redudant，that..and that这种结构是固定结构吗？求老师指教，谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

麻烦老师帮我解决一下这一题，看ABCD这个走向，它主要是想进一步说明一下w是怎么样的。A主要是错在where 不能修饰society CD主要错在就近修饰W的话，主谓不一致。E答案，犹豫了一下，就是living按照语法规则修饰到yellow也是合理的，所以E被排除掉的理由是从and这个并列上来看，是因为it 没有能指代的名词吗？因为前面不管是YJ 还是SPECIES 或 w都是复数的形式