还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B、Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C、More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D、Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E、A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

答案:

E

提问:

1 文章读成这样:高关税是的nuts只能卖到国内。买到世界价格,农民获利。但是,因为工厂在urban(不认识urban) area ,降税使得失业率未来可能上升。 2然后:A B D都排除了 剩下 C E 3选C :人分成两拨儿 一拨儿farmer 另一拨儿processor,农民的利润升高了,所以 农民失业少了,总体这两拨儿人 根据C选项所说农民占多数。那既然占多数的不失业,总体失业就必然不会增加。所以选 C 不选E:因为不知道 urban是指城市还是乡村,所以农民离开土地到城市中去,不知道跟原文说的urban area是否一致(因为如果相反的话,可能跟原文讨论的就不是一个事儿了) 4 思维错误点:挣钱=能持续就业=失业率不上升 区域和总体 urban unemployment 不等于total unemployment 我以上所找到的思维错误正中要害吗? 还是,有其他的思维错误点没找出来? 老师,您能帮忙看看吗?谢谢您了!

解答:

点赞0
阅读14183
解答: sysadmin

提问:

为什么B是无关的呢?我第一次看的时候排除不了

解答:

点赞0
阅读7376
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

D,E不会比较

解答:

点赞0
阅读1670
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询