还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
B、Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores.
C、At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
D、Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
E、Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's.

答案:

B

提问:

文章讲在一地儿,打折店要关张因为S店刚开,但是这些地儿不会空着,又因为C一个不打折店开张,有个打折店竞争不过C就在购物区那些倒闭的店那儿开张了 原文有点儿乱,屡不清逻辑关系就直接看选项 问哪个驳斥 A 顾客买东西多少,无关 B 在购物区开的店都是什么样的店,不能确定肯定无关,留着 C 开店数量多少,好像沾点儿 D 这个地方人口增长快慢的问题,无关 E 商店卖商品在哪儿有没有,无关 就剩B和C有点关系,觉得文章提过好多点要关,又说店位不会空着,C相对而言更直接就选了C B为什么比C好不明白

解答:

点赞0
阅读2158
解答: sysadmin

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询