还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B、Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C、More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D、Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E、A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

答案:

E

提问:

老师,读这题感觉五个都木有关系,然后觉得B的这个 想在芬兰的那个,就选了B。我知道是类比错误,可是真的在考场上看不出不来什么关系,改肿么选出来呢,谢谢老师~

解答:

点赞0
阅读14202
解答: sysadmin

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询