还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Editorial:
 
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
 
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

选项:

A、The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B、Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C、People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D、The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E、People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案:

C

提问:

请唐老师解答一下, 题干说的是 accept job, 接受工作, E选项在这一方面比C选项的 look for job, 找工作, 更有优势, 为何排除? 我的想法是, E选项是支持; 但如果考试的时候分析的这么细, 是不是会消耗时间多?

解答:

点赞0
阅读8957
解答: 唐瑭

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询