还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B、Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C、More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D、Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E、A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

答案:

E

提问:

请问唐瑭老师,这道题我没有看明白E和最后一句话之间的关系,读了其他选项也觉得很迷糊,麻烦请您解答

解答:

点赞0
阅读8412
解答: 唐瑭

提问:

为什么B是无关的呢?我第一次看的时候排除不了

解答:

点赞0
阅读7391
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

D,E不会比较

解答:

点赞0
阅读1685
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询