还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to situations they encounter by drawing on the past experience of similar situations. But this does not require that animals perfectly recall every detail of all their experiences. Instead, to function well, memory should generalize from past experiences that are similar to the current one.
The neuroscientist’s statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
The neuroscientist’s statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
选项:
A、At least some animals perfectly recall every detail of at least some past experiences.
B、Perfectly recalling every detail of all their past experiences could help at least some animals react more appropriately than they otherwise would to new situations they encounter.
C、Generalizing from past experiences requires clear memories of most if not all the details of those experiences.
D、Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be incompatible with any ability to generalize from those experiences.
E、Animals can often react more appropriately than they otherwise would to situations they encounter if they draw on generalizations from past experiences of similar situations.
答案:
E
提问：
这道题做对了。但在C和E中纠结，因为感觉C与原文最后一句也有联系（我理解的原文最后一句的意思是：为了可以更好应对，记忆应该从过去相似的经验产生）请问一下C犯了什么逻辑错误，谢谢
解答：
点赞0
阅读14503
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
