[Problem Solving]
试题详情
题目:
[2(4-1)2]/2(3-2)
选项:
A、28
B、27
C、26
D、25
E、24
答案:
A
Line | Two works published in 1984 demonstrate |
contrasting approaches to writing the history of | |
United States women. Buel and Buels biography | |
of Mary Fish (1736–1818) makes little effort to | |
(5) | place her story in the context of recent |
historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, | |
attempts not only to write the history of women in | |
one southern community, but also to redirect two | |
decades of historiographical debate as to | |
(10) | whether women gained or lost status in the |
nineteenth century as compared with the | |
eighteenth century. Although both books offer the | |
reader the opportunity to assess this controversy | |
regarding womens status, only Lebsocks deals with | |
(15) | it directly. She examines several different aspects |
of womens status, helping to refine and resolve the | |
issues. She concludes that while | |
women gained autonomy in some areas, | |
especially in the private sphere, they lost it in | |
(20) | many aspects of the economic sphere. More |
importantly, she shows that the debate itself | |
depends on frame of reference: in many respects, | |
women lost power in relation to men, for example, | |
as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising | |
(25) | schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also |
gained power in comparison with their previous | |
status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, | |
for example. In contrast, Buel and Buels | |
biography provides ample raw material for | |
(30) | questioning the myth, fostered by some |
historians, of a colonial golden age in the | |
eighteenth century but does not give the reader | |
much guidance in analyzing the controversy over | |
womens status. |