Critical Reasoning
试题详情
题目：
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
选项:
A、The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B、During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C、Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D、Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E、During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
答案:
B
提问：
留下BC是因为觉得和文章有关，比较BC后还很难判断但此时倾向于C，又读了遍原文觉得文章说失业率没有降低，政府又开设了免费的项目，然后师生比例也没有变化，所以自己就想免费的项目能吸引学生，学生人数上涨，师生比要不变化那老师也增多 故最后错选C。
请老师讲解 谢谢。
评分:
-1
浏览:
2059
提问：
这道题目我根据范围把5个选项都排除了，我当时排除正确选项B的原因是原文围绕的是government-funded schools在说，而B选项是围绕privately funded schools在说。请老师指教是哪一步出现问题了。
评分:
0
浏览:
2052
提问：
这道题我把五个选项都排除了，选不出来于是蒙了个C，觉得C说了公立学校老师数量的问题，和原文有点关系。正确答案B我认为讲了关于私立学校学生数量的问题，而原文讲的是公立学校的老师和学生。我觉得这两个不是一件事。听了很多录音，还是不明白，麻烦英哥再点播点播。
评分:
0
浏览:
2067
