Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations.  However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools.  This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
 
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

选项:

A、The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B、During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C、Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D、Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E、During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.

答案:

B

提问:

麻烦问一下这道题AB A是说其他学校可能会给学生免费上学的机会 这样有可能导致学生数量不会增加 等于破坏了逻辑链的基础 B我想问一下 题目里面是说找一份教学的工作不会很难 是指岗位供给变多 并不等于说教师数量一定增长 但B讨论的是教师数量是否会增长 想问一下我的思路错在哪
评分: 1
浏览: 13567

提问:

老师,这个题不会做,我把原文读到的程度是:V地的公立学校的师生比(S/T)不能超过一个限制,在公立学校上课的学生是免学费的。(背景部分介绍完)推理部分: 前提--经济衰退导致收入下降,学生挤向公立学校。 结论--在公立学校找工作的难度下降。 看完之后,不知道该怎么下手了,这该怎么排除选项啊 (郭培月老师)
评分: 0
浏览: 17322

提问:

老师好,1.想请问一下逻辑题中,时间是不是一个可靠的排除选项的方法,比如ACD都讨论的是上一次经济危机的比较,和现在这一次没有什么关系,2.因为在排除选项时候,我总不太能确定有关无关,如何判断选项有关无关呢(这个问题好像有点虚,但我总担心出现那种完全想不到但是是正确答案的选项所以不敢排掉)?谢谢老师
评分: 1
浏览: 17298

提问:

在B,C中纠结。 觉得B说的是经济强的时候,有25%的儿童在私立学校上学,那有75%的在公立学校,75%比例算挺高的,所以公立学校老师也本来比较多。所以如果经济变差,读私立学校的可能会转到公立学校,相应的公立学校的老师需求会更多,所以可以推出经济衰退,公立学校老师数量不会下降。但好绕。 C说的是与最近一次经济衰退相比,公立学校老师的数量上升了,所以经济衰退不会影响公立学校老师的数量,挺直接的。是不是因为currently所以不对,我感觉一些题目除非所有选项都出现currenrtly或者其他一样的时间,要不一般情况下这种选项都不对。不知道这种感觉对不对。 另外,我想知道像这样逻辑题的原因部分有两个或以上的原因,做题的时候要怎么关注重点?还是说strenghthen argument 重点应该在其结论,就是只要能够支持经济衰退不会影响公立学校老师的岗位就行。
评分: -1
浏览: 17400

提问:

老师您好,我想问一下这个题的c选项究竟是怎么排除掉的?我选c的原因是因为c说现在的公立学校老师雇佣量比上一次经济危机之前的雇佣量多了,这让我觉得经过经济危机老师雇佣的数量增加了,支持了原文说的经济危机不会影响老师雇佣量的说法。我这样想是脑补太多了吗?后来又想了想,排除c的角度可不可以是,原文说的是any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools,说的是future,但c说的是过去的一次经济危机的事儿,可以这样排除吗?麻烦老师解答下c排除的思路,谢谢老师!
评分: -1
浏览: 17402

提问:

这道题目感觉选项B和问题没有关系,问的是government funded, 但选项中给的是private.
评分: 2
浏览: 17505

提问:

这道题的b为什么是加强
评分: 1
浏览: 17355

提问:

不知道如何入手,听了录音还不明白,请老师解答。
评分: -1
浏览: 17329

提问:

纠结在 B和 C 之间, 题干讲的主要是老师的问题,怎么 选 B啊
评分: 0
浏览: 17331

提问:

In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession. During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession. Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers. During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded. 听了录音,感觉讲得不明白啊。首先,英老师读原文说讲了学费花不花钱的事。可是原文的主旨应该是萧条时期找工作是否困难的事啊,是和工作有关,怎么能截取原文后半段交不交学费谈。。。
评分: 0
浏览: 17471
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询