Critical Reasoning
试题详情
题目：
In one state, all cities and most towns have anti-smoking ordinances. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
选项:
A、Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B、In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
C、The state law would supersede the local anti-smoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D、There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E、The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
答案:
C
提问：
我看完了答案了，你看看我理解的对不对：一个州很多地方有禁烟法，请愿颁布一个州范围的禁烟法，通过那些Campaign worker散播给voter.问，以下哪个会误导voter，让vorter认为这个提议将地方法扩大到州。C说的州法没有地方法严厉。 这就是我理解的，依然没有特别理解C的用以。
评分:
-1
浏览:
8809
提问：
选C还是选E，之前的录音听的好混乱开始都说选E，但最新的一个录音英大大说选C。C和E都不能理解。。。我错选的D，其实也不是很理解D为什么不对~求指导~~
评分:
0
浏览:
8578
提问：
老师这题问以下什么情况会误导那些认为这个提案是扩大到全国的人，ABD可以明显排除，我读E的时候觉得E说的是个很具体的细节，国家法律不影响地方法律禁止吸烟好像并没有和问题有什么关系；C说国家法律会代替更加严格的地方法律，给人一种并不是提倡地方法律而是想阻止地方法律的感觉，所以我选了C。。。
评分:
-1
浏览:
8626
提问：
做题思路：上来先用有关无关排除了ABD，然后留了c和E，感觉问题中misleading是反方向的，有种驳斥老板的意思，读c感觉是一种不爽的感觉，而e没有这种不爽的感觉，所以最后选了C
评分:
1
浏览:
8551
