Critical Reasoning

[Critical Reasoning] 试题详情

Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing cancer, researchers believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause, since in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from healthy tissue, contain SV40.  SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus.  Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine was the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.
 
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers' hypothesis?

Options:

SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent contamination with SV40.
Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still show traces of the virus.
In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history of exposure to asbestos.
In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples from mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.

Correct:

E

Critical Reasoning

0评分
216浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师,麻烦讲解这种信息量巨大,而且都是生词,再加上逻辑关系绕来绕去的,根本理不清楚的逻辑要怎么搞定?谢谢
2评分
191浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师,可不可以详细讲一下这道题?为什么要选E?E选项里说没有疫苗从来没有受到感染。这个选项怎么可能support assumption呢?
0评分
150浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师, 我有两个问题。 这道题做题时看到选项E 本来想选, 觉得相关, 但是 因为句首 in Finland 最后排除了这个选项, 感觉范围不对。 因为一般做题都会注意一下选项讨论内容的范围, 那这个讨论范围到底应该怎么看呢? 选项C 相当于重复了原文原有信息, 是不是就可以看作是无关选项?
0评分
150浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

按照老英讲的,e使的文章的论点正确的几率上升,所以比较好,这个理解。但老管曾经说过,别的地方有就有,跟我这儿的有什么关系?为什么会这样,还是老管这条不适合这题?
-2评分
129浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

能否完整的讲解一下这道题?谢谢
0评分
125浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

C和E的比较,老鹰解释一下C为什么被排除吧~
-1评分
120浏览
0评分
216浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师,麻烦讲解这种信息量巨大,而且都是生词,再加上逻辑关系绕来绕去的,根本理不清楚的逻辑要怎么搞定?谢谢
2评分
191浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师,可不可以详细讲一下这道题?为什么要选E?E选项里说没有疫苗从来没有受到感染。这个选项怎么可能support assumption呢?
0评分
150浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师, 我有两个问题。 这道题做题时看到选项E 本来想选, 觉得相关, 但是 因为句首 in Finland 最后排除了这个选项, 感觉范围不对。 因为一般做题都会注意一下选项讨论内容的范围, 那这个讨论范围到底应该怎么看呢? 选项C 相当于重复了原文原有信息, 是不是就可以看作是无关选项?
0评分
150浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

按照老英讲的,e使的文章的论点正确的几率上升,所以比较好,这个理解。但老管曾经说过,别的地方有就有,跟我这儿的有什么关系?为什么会这样,还是老管这条不适合这题?
-2评分
129浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

能否完整的讲解一下这道题?谢谢
0评分
125浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

C和E的比较,老鹰解释一下C为什么被排除吧~
-1评分
120浏览

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询