Critical Reasoning
试题详情
题目：
Editorial:
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
选项:
A、The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B、Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C、People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D、The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E、People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.
答案:
C
提问：
请唐老师解答一下, 题干说的是 accept job, 接受工作, E选项在这一方面比C选项的 look for job, 找工作, 更有优势, 为何排除? 我的想法是, E选项是支持; 但如果考试的时候分析的这么细, 是不是会消耗时间多?
评分:
0
浏览:
8947
提问：
唐老师, 这题C和E均提到financial incentive及工作, 如何在这二者间区分? E的话, 感觉是支持, 所以把它去掉 (C的话, 感觉不出明显的支持或者驳斥), 但是考试时, 这么分析很花时间, 有没有更快速的方法去做选择?谢谢!
评分:
0
浏览:
9001
提问：
…为了降低失业率，政府的一个措施，就是如果你找了工作，但是薪水低于政府assistance，则我给你supplement income:，另外如果有工作的人的薪水，这道题题目没看懂；怎么去理解有what的句子，老师之前也讲过a is to b what c is to d;这里what 表示就好像；这里的what怎么去理解，有没有类似像定语从句一样有规律的去解读what句型？
评分:
0
浏览:
12572
提问：
英老师说D选项是个不相干选项。而我认为这是一个support选项
可是我觉得D翻译为：那些每年不工作的人收到的政府资助比他们每年的工资要少。这将使得大家更加不工作。
而我们需要找出一个选项说政府的assistance是有用的促进大家工作。
请老师看一下我哪里理解错了
评分:
0
浏览:
12564
