Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

It has been suggested that with the continued advance of technology, robots will be able to replace skilled craftsmen who currently assemble and test sophisticated manufactured goods, such as musical instruments. This suggestion is based on the belief that the assembly and testing of musical instruments consists of learning a series of techniques and processes, which can be programmed automatically without any understanding of how the various parts are supposed to work together to produce a high quality musical instrument. If this were the case, then robots could be programmed to follow the techniques and processes, and craftsmen would not be needed to assemble and test the instruments. But to do their jobs, skilled craftsmen must also understand the principles of sound production, together with the nuances of tone quality and the other criteria of a high quality musical instrument. Therefore, the idea that robots will replace people in the production of musical instruments is seriously flawed.
Which one of the following selections, if true, would most seriously weaken the author’s conclusion that robots will not replace skilled craftsmen in the production of musical instruments?

选项:

A、A. Not as many musical instruments are being produced today, so the industry cannot afford to pay skilled craftsmen.
B、B. Musical instruments are not produced individually any more, but are mass produced in factories.
C、C. Robots can be programmed to understand the principles of sound production, the nuances of tone quality and the other criteria of a high quality musical instrument.
D、D. Robots can accomplish mundane assembly tasks much more cost-effectively than skilled craftsmen can.
E、E. Skilled craftsmen are responsible for ensuring that musical instruments meet high quality standards.

答案:

C

提问:

题目逻辑链就是:组装和测试乐器都是包含了一些列能被自动编好程序without any understanding(具体细节)所能替代的,但好些乐器制作还是需要understand一些(细节),结论就是,robots不可以替代人类。 题目让削弱这个结论--机器人不能代替技术工种来生产乐器 我做错 B. Musical instruments are not produced individually any more, but are mass produced in factories.是因为,既然说机器人不能代替技术工种生产乐器,那就说能代替啊,所以,就是击破那个生产乐器是需要with understanding的点就好了。因为乐器都是大批量生产工厂作坊出来的,所以就可以反击机器人不能代替人生产乐器的结论了。为什么不对。 但同时,读完正确答案,也可以理解了正确答案是击中了understand可以被编成进robot的,解决了这个障碍,所以robot可以替代人类。 但对于我自己做新题目时候,怎么思考,我还是没有更好的方法去总结出来。您可以帮我看看我的毛病出在哪? 感谢老师纠正我的逻辑错误,我尽力扭转思路
评分: 0
浏览: 389
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询