Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
 
The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

选项:

A、many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food's having a longer shelf life
B、it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
C、cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
D、certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
E、for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

答案:

E

提问:

请唐老师解答一下,多谢! 为什么B选项, 不是看整个句子?记得讲过, 用技巧做题的话, 要每个选项都要明白意思. 而且读完后发现, not the only, (不是唯一的, 都有什么没讲), 所以听起来很 Misleading.[img=/uploads/askimgs/gmat-20230803-140836.jpeg]
评分: 0
浏览: 1046

提问:

唐瑭老师直接用it is clear,ensure,infact这几个词排除了bcd,但我觉得只看这些词有些主观。最后一句说misleading是对fact的误导,所以我往前看了一小句发现fact说的是irradiation不比cooking差,因此觉得(文字打不下见图片[img=/uploads/askimgs/gmat-20210819-164314.png]
评分: 0
浏览: 1575
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询