Critical Reasoning
试题详情
题目：
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
选项:
A、some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
B、the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
C、a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
D、a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
E、 with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
答案:
C
提问：
想了很久都不明白D 为什么错？后来明白一些，不知道我这么想对不对 ？
因为diner seated on stools 呆的时间不长于diners seated at standard-height tables。 D说消费时间越短，顾客一般点更便宜的meals. less expensive meals 不一定就less profitable ?
评分:
1
浏览:
3029
提问：
原文读出来是 顾客喜欢高椅子因为能看见名人,顾客坐的时间长短,和这个餐厅会不会盈利
A.名人会不会选高椅子 干掉
B.名人花的钱能不能让餐厅赚钱 干掉
C.坐高椅子的顾客是一个例外对于闲逛 跟时间沾点先放着
D.时间短的顾客花的钱也少了 留着
E.椅子多了就看只能看见椅子了 留着
最后c看到a customer而原文是many,杀了,选了D
听录音听多了,在范围理解上有点晕,麻烦英老师讲讲范围,谢谢了!
评分:
0
浏览:
2873
提问：
说好莱坞用标准桌子，顾客来这为了看明星，愿意坐高点儿桌子看明星，并且坐高桌子比标准桌呆的时间少点儿，因此餐馆多加点儿高桌子能获利
问驳斥原文
我只把A扔了，因为太不靠谱
B说明星们要菜的价格能补偿什么东西，好得和利润稍微沾点儿，放着
C不知道说什么呢，留着
D呆的时间少的比呆的时间多的点的菜便宜，也和利润沾点儿，留着
E说高桌子太多人们什么都看不见，和人们看得见名人也有点儿联系，也留着
剩下4个选项，而且觉得BDE都让相信度降低，完全死菜
评分:
0
浏览:
2869
