Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually.  In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices.  Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.
 
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?

选项:

A、After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products.
B、The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.
C、Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.
D、In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.
E、After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia.

答案:

A

提问:

错选了C,原文逻辑也不太明白
评分: -1
浏览: 3048

提问:

如题!
评分: 0
浏览: 3101

提问:

a我觉得讲的是用新的换旧的药,但原文说的是药的价格不准上涨。因为没有明确说哪种药,所以不管用新的还是旧的都应该是无关啊。 我觉得5个选项都是无关。不知道应该怎么对比选项。 请老师指导。
评分: 1
浏览: 3121

提问:

A整体的句意是 有没有方法去替换现在的产品,无关选项
评分: 0
浏览: 3072
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询