Critical Reasoning
试题详情
题目：
To reduce the danger to life and property posed by major earthquakes, scientists have been investigating several techniques for giving advance warning of dangerous earthquakes. Since catfish swim erratically before earthquakes, some investigators have proposed monitoring catfish to predict dangerous earthquakes.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the usefulness of the proposal?
选项:
A、In Japan, which is subject to frequent earthquakes, the behavior of catfish has long been associated with earthquakes.
B、Mechanical methods for detecting earthquakes have not proved effective.
C、Tremors lead to the release of hydrogen sulfide gas into water, thereby causing various fish and shellfish to behave erratically.
D、Careful construction can reduce the dangers posed by earthquakes.
E、Even very slight, fleeting tremors cause catfish to swim erratically.
答案:
E
提问：
可以因为无关排除BD
A我理解的是那个鱼的行为一直伴随着地震，有点同时的感觉，所以不能用来预测
C感觉像是在说鱼产生行为错乱的原因，而不是说能不能预测，所以也可以排除 ？ （不太确定这个判断的对不对）
E这个第一遍做觉得像是在支持（即使振动很轻，鱼也可以做出反应）。 之后看的时候想了想，觉得这个选项能作为答案的原因是不是说，这个鱼很敏感所以要是根据这个鱼的行为来预测就会产生误判。 有点需要联想一下
麻烦老师帮我看看怎么能在第一遍就搞定
评分:
0
浏览:
2111
