Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in Meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago.  The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10 percent.  These figures support the conclusion that residents of Meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of Parkdale.
 
The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account

选项:

A、changes in the population density of both Parkdale and Meadowbrook over the past four years
B、how the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for Parkdale
C、the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in Meadowbrook and Parkdale
D、the violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and Parkdale four years ago
E、how Meadowbrook's expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to Parkdale's expenditures

答案:

D

提问:

选的a m的犯罪率比十年前高了60%而p只高了10%,说明m的居民更容易犯罪 选a,我觉得如果人口密度m这几年大幅下降的话,虽然犯罪人数比例高了单实际犯罪人数不一定增加了,因此就无法得出本文结论 求老师解答
评分: 0
浏览: 2037

提问:

(问题与题目无关,不写ID不让提交,谢谢老师指点) 最近总结出来自己最大的问题是: 看选项是扫读,自然而然的,会挑几个词,然后把词义用自己的想法连接起来。 并且有时还会根据某些词出现过没有,而排除或是选择选项。 我做题之前,都要给自己默念几遍,认真看选项,每个字都看进去,并没什么大起色。有时还会犯您上次说的,我机械的一字字翻译选项错误
评分: 0
浏览: 1963

提问:

错选了A, 主要是看到percentage就想到population作为基数。review的时候又感觉是B, 也是因为与population沾边。 可是答案是D, 请问这道题是根据逻辑推理做出来还是相关不相关? 如何排除A和B?
评分: 0
浏览: 2081

提问:

cr
评分: 0
浏览: 2044
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询