Reading Comprehension

试题详情

文章:

    Diamonds are almost impossible to detect directly because they are so rare: very rich kimberlite pipes, the routes through which diamonds rise, may contain only three carats of diamonds per ton of kimberlite. Kimberlite begins as magma in Earth's mantle (the layer between the crust and the core). As the magma smashes through layers of rock, it rips out debris, creating a mix of liquid and solid material. Some of the solid material it brings up may come from a so-called diamond-stability field, where conditions of pressure and temperature are conducive to the formation of diamonds. If diamonds are to survive, though, they must shoot toward Earth's surface quickly. Otherwise, they revert to graphite or burn. Explorers seeking diamonds look for specks of "indicator minerals" peculiar to the mantle but carried up in greater quantities than diamonds and eroded out of kimberlite pipes into the surrounding land. The standard ones are garnets, chromites, and ilmenites. One can spend years searching for indicators and tracing them back to the pipes that are their source; however, 90 percent of kimberlite pipes found this way are barren of diamonds, and the rest are usually too sparse to mine.

    In the 1970's the process of locating profitable pipes was refined by focusing on the subtle differences between the chemical signatures of indicator minerals found in diamond-rich pipes as opposed to those found in barren pipes. For example, G10 garnets, a type of garnet typically found in diamond-rich pipes, are lower in calcium and higher in chrome than garnets from barren pipes. Geo-chemists John Gurney showed that garnets with this composition were formed only in the diamond-stability field; more commonly found versions came from elsewhere in the mantle. Gurney also found that though ilmenites did not form in the diamond-stability field, there was a link useful for prospectors: when the iron in ilmenite was highly oxidized, its source pipe rarely contained any diamonds. He reasoned that iron took on more or less oxygen in response to conditions in the kimberlitic magma itself—mainly in response to heat and the available oxygen. When iron became highly oxidized, so did diamonds; that is, they vaporized into carbon dioxide.

题目:

The primary purpose of the passage is to

选项:

A、discuss an objection to Gurney's theories about the uses of indicator minerals
B、explore the formation of diamonds and the reasons for their scarcity
C、analyze the importance of kimberlite pipes in the formation of diamonds
D、define the characteristics of indicator minerals under differing conditions
E、explain a method of determining whether kimberlite pipes are likely to contain diamonds

答案:

E

提问:

GDW第五套题23,当使用唐老师的方法没读文章直接选,没选对,可能我的方法还有不对的地方,想听一下唐老师怎么分析这道题[img=/resource/2020-11/233-1606373488.png]
评分: 0
浏览: 3001

提问:

我选的B 做题的时候想法:看了问题,问文章的主要目的。 应该找 观点脉络。 开始读文章。 第一段Diamonds are almost impossible to detect directly because they are so rare:后面一堆细节 第二段 In the 1970's细节。。。He reasoned that iron took on more or less oxygen in response to conditions in the kimberlitic magma itself—mainly in response to heat and the available oxygen. When iron became highly oxidized, so did diamonds; that is, they vaporized into carbon dioxide. 读完了开始看选项 AD连边都不沾,排除。C说K pipe重要性,可好像没有这种信息,判断不了。 本来想选E,看它有许多我读过的信息,出错的可能性小。 可是看B更好。因为当时突然一下子感觉文章是围绕着diamond讲的,这个选项很有代表性。 1.请老师帮我分析一下,我的做题流程,违背了什么原则点,改哪能选出正确选项? 2.老师,您能讲一下选择“错误的机会最小的选项”,和选择“合理选项”的两种选择方式区别在哪吗?就比如这道题。
评分: -2
浏览: 3046

提问:

原来的录音感觉什么都没讲。需再来份靠谱的讲解~ 我是扫了文章的脉络,讲了diamond检验特别困难,因为形成的时候就怎么怎么样,不然就会变成什么大理石之类的,然后第二段讲了检测方法refine,举了例子。 看了下选项就觉得B靠谱点,比较沾边,就选了B。
评分: 0
浏览: 3071

提问:

可以排出ACD,剩下BD,感觉和文章都沾,错选了B...
评分: -1
浏览: 3041
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询