Critical Reasoning
试题详情
题目：
The contingency-fee system, which allows lawyers and their clients to agree that the lawyer will be paid only in the event of success, does not increase the number of medical malpractice lawsuits brought against doctors. As attorneys must cover the costs for their time and research, they want to be assured that any medical malpractice case they accept on a contingency-fee basis has substantial merit. Consequently, attorneys turn away many people who come to see them, for lack of a good case.
The argument above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to
选项:
A、specify the criteria attorneys use to judge the merits of a medical malpractice case
B、consider whether, in the absence of a contingency-fee option, even people with meritorious cases are much less likely to initiate litigation if they believe they might incur large legal fees
C、note whether, in successful medical malpractice lawsuits, the average monetary award after legal costs have been deducted is less under contingency-fee arrangements than otherwise
D、consider the effect of the contingency-fee system on the number of lawsuits sought for reasons other than medical malpractice
E、acknowledge the rising cost of medical malpractice insurance
答案:
B
提问：
想问陆旭老师这题的C为什么是加强？（官方解析说的）我对题目的理解是contingency-fee system要求律师在赢了案子后才能得到付款，但是对医疗相关的案件接的数量影响小，argument的结论是因为律师不想接这种案子，想接胜率大好赚钱的案例。我对C的理解就是，他提出了一个他因：就算是赢了的医疗案例，律师收的钱也少，所以他们不愿意这么做。B的话就是您上课说的正负得负，但是我觉得C和文章更贴近，就选了。
评分:
1
浏览:
2153
