Critical Reasoning

[Critical Reasoning] 试题详情

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.  Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way.  Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.  Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation.  Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.
 
In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

Options:

The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.
The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.
The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.
The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.
The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

Correct:

A

Critical Reasoning

2评分
163浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

虽然已经有很多解答录音,但是我还是有一点疑问。 做题过程:A选项读完没什么太大感觉,留着; BE第二个不是CON,杀;C,读完原文,第一句黑体说的是Pro-Tect不能怎么怎么样,因此只能采取第二句黑体的方法;D自己做题的时候需 觉得D和C意思挺像的,杀D的原因是第一句话是一个consideration,觉得不太算是evidence 想问C错在了哪里?说一种方法不行不是把另外的路堵死了,对现在的方法的一种支持吗? 拜托老师解答~
0评分
122浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

第一个黑体感觉更像原因或者事实而不是策略 为何选A不选D
-1评分
87浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师您好, 请问为什么选项B不正确?
0评分
80浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

一道超多人问却没有解答的题
0评分
68浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

录音没太听明白,我错选了C,虽然觉得也很牵强,但是当时读A 的时候,看到instead就理解成,前后两个strategy应该是方向相反的,可题干中给的两个是不同的角度,所以就排除了A。。。
0评分
61浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

因为第一个黑体字后面有cannot,所以应该是一个cosideration,并且不支持某个观点,所以去掉了BCD。留下了C和E,因为看到了第二个黑体字有therefore,所以觉得E更好。但如果把原文看一遍,就知道应该选A。所以碰到BF题型,读文章有时候还是管用的,不知道是不是可以这么做?
-1评分
55浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

英吉老师在之前的录音说,A选项讲的是同一个stratrgy, C选项讲的是不同的strategy,不用读原文,只是从原文therefore这个词就知道它在讲同一个strategy。 所以选择A。我对答案选哪个没有疑问,但问题是,读了原文我发现therefore前后讲的是两个不同的strategy啊
2评分
163浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

虽然已经有很多解答录音,但是我还是有一点疑问。 做题过程:A选项读完没什么太大感觉,留着; BE第二个不是CON,杀;C,读完原文,第一句黑体说的是Pro-Tect不能怎么怎么样,因此只能采取第二句黑体的方法;D自己做题的时候需 觉得D和C意思挺像的,杀D的原因是第一句话是一个consideration,觉得不太算是evidence 想问C错在了哪里?说一种方法不行不是把另外的路堵死了,对现在的方法的一种支持吗? 拜托老师解答~
0评分
122浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

第一个黑体感觉更像原因或者事实而不是策略 为何选A不选D
-1评分
87浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

老师您好, 请问为什么选项B不正确?
0评分
80浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

一道超多人问却没有解答的题
0评分
68浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

录音没太听明白,我错选了C,虽然觉得也很牵强,但是当时读A 的时候,看到instead就理解成,前后两个strategy应该是方向相反的,可题干中给的两个是不同的角度,所以就排除了A。。。
0评分
61浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

因为第一个黑体字后面有cannot,所以应该是一个cosideration,并且不支持某个观点,所以去掉了BCD。留下了C和E,因为看到了第二个黑体字有therefore,所以觉得E更好。但如果把原文看一遍,就知道应该选A。所以碰到BF题型,读文章有时候还是管用的,不知道是不是可以这么做?
-1评分
55浏览

[点此查看答疑][GWD]Critical Reasoning

英吉老师在之前的录音说,A选项讲的是同一个stratrgy, C选项讲的是不同的strategy,不用读原文,只是从原文therefore这个词就知道它在讲同一个strategy。 所以选择A。我对答案选哪个没有疑问,但问题是,读了原文我发现therefore前后讲的是两个不同的strategy啊

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询