Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

Petrochemical industry officials have said that the extreme pressure exerted on plant managers during the last five years to improve profits by cutting costs has done nothing to impair the industry’s ability to operate safely. However, environmentalists contend that the recent rash of serious oil spills and accidents at petrochemical plants is traceable to cost-cutting measures.

Which of the following, if true, would provide the strongest support for the position held by industry officials?

选项:

A、The petrochemical industry benefits if accidents do not occur, since accidents involve risk of employee injury as well as loss of equipment and product.
B、Petrochemical industry unions recently demanded that additional money be spent on safety and environmental protection measures, but the unions readily abandoned those demands in exchange for job security.
C、Despite major cutbacks in most other areas of operation, the petrochemical industry has devoted more of its resources to environmental and safety measures in the last five years than in the preceding five years.
D、There is evidence that the most damaging of the recent oil spills would have been prevented had cost-cutting measures not been instituted.
E、Both the large fines and the adverse publicity generated by the most recent oil spill have prompted the petrochemical industry to increase the resources devoted to oil-spill prevention.

答案:

C

提问:

老师请解释下c选项,觉得因为后面有个than in the preceding xxx觉得比之前五年多并不能说之前五年的事故就低。如果花的钱多导致事故数降低,则说明花钱和事故率有关,直接排除了,后来矮子里拔将军选了a。请老师解释下c并如何在考场上怎么避免这种错误
评分: 0
浏览: 6424

提问:

请问王文静老师d选项句子结构怎么分析,had cost-cutting measures not been instituted,是不是省略if 条件状语倒装,不需要逗号吗?请老师把这个句子分析一下谢谢
评分: 1
浏览: 6741

提问:

B选项犯的什么逻辑错误。感觉难读懂
评分: 0
浏览: 7062

提问:

老师我不明白C这个last 5 years和preceding 5 years的比较 还有D为啥不对
评分: 0
浏览: 7339

提问:

老师这道题有一些便捷的方法做题吗?因为这道题的选项比较长,也有一些我不太认识的词,考试的时候可能速度会比较慢。怎么样能快速的答长文章长选项的题目呢?
评分: 2
浏览: 7318

提问:

原文逻辑链是什么 d怎么错了
评分: 0
浏览: 7054

提问:

老师 这道题不太懂为什么选c 能不能讲解一下 谢谢
评分: 1
浏览: 7016
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询