Reading Comprehension

试题详情

文章:

Line         Because the framers of the United States
  Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting
  property rights relating to inventions would encourage
  the new nation’s economic growth, they gave
(5) Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional
  mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting
  patent system has served as a model for those in
  other nations. Recently, however, scholars have
  questioned whether the American system helped
(10) achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have
  contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American
  inventors were unable to enforce property rights
  because judges were “antipatent” and routinely
  invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This
(15) argument is based partly on examination of court
  decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”)
  brought suit alleging infringement of their patent
  rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent
  of verdicts were decided against the patentee.
(20) The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to
  increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars
  that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began
  shifting then.
       Not all patent disputes in the early nineteenth
(25) century were litigated, however, and litigated
  cases were not drawn randomly from the
  population of disputes. Therefore the rate of
  verdicts in favor of patentees cannot be used
  by itself to gauge changes in judicial attitudes
(30) or enforceability of patent rights. If early judicial
  decisions were prejudiced against patentees, one
  might expect that subsequent courts—allegedly
  more supportive of patent rights—would reject
  the former legal precedents. But pre-1830
(35) cases have been cited as frequently as later
  decisions, and they continue to be cited today,
  suggesting that the early decisions, many of
  which clearly declared that patent rights were
  a just recompense for inventive ingenuity,
(40) provided a lasting foundation for patent law.
  The proportion of judicial decisions in favor of
  patentees began to increase during the 1830s
  because of a change in the underlying population
  of cases brought to trial. This change was partly
(45) due to an 1836 revision to the patent system:
  an examination procedure, still in use today, was
  instituted in which each application is scrutinized
  for its adherence to patent law. Previously,
  patents were automatically granted upon payment
(50) of a $30 fee.


题目:

The author of the passage cites which of the following as evidence challenging the argument referred to in lines 14–15 ?

选项:

A、The proportion of cases that were decided against patentees in the 1820s
B、The total number of patent disputes that were litigated from 1794 to 1830
C、The fact that later courts drew upon the legal precedents set in pre-1830 patent cases
D、The fact that the proportion of judicial decisions in favor of patentees began to increase during the 1830s
E、The constitutional rationale for the 1836 revision of the patent system

答案:

C

提问:

定位到14-15行this argument 然后往前找 这个argument是什么 (前一句) judges were “antipatent” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons.司法是反对patent 的 选项 D 说的是 司法决定支持patentees 的比率增多 我认为可以表达challenge 所以选 D 请问老师我的思路错在哪里 ? C比D 好在哪里? 谢谢老师
评分: -3
浏览: 453
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询