Reading Comprehension

试题详情

文章:

Line         It is an odd but indisputable fact that the
  seventeenth-century English women who are
  generally regarded as among the forerunners of
  modern feminism are almost all identified with the
(5) Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.
  Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the
  radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century
  political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism
(10) that equates family and kingdom and asserts the
  divinely ordained absolute power of the king and,
  by analogy, of the male head of the household—
  historians have been understandably puzzled by the
  fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest
(15) extended criticisms of the absolute subordination
  of women in marriage and the earliest systematic
  assertions of women’s rational and moral equality
  with men. Some historians have questioned the
  facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian
(20) patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been
  no consistent differences between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians on issues of family organization
  and women’s political rights, but in that case one
  would expect early feminists to be equally divided
(25) between the two sides.
       Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism
  engendered feminism because the ideology of
  absolute monarchy provided a transition to an
  ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example
(30) of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret
  Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle.
  Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any
  woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she
  was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real
(35) world, she resolved to be mistress of her own
  world, the “immaterial world” that any person can
  create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on
  paper. In proclaiming what she called her
  “singularity,” Cavendish insisted that she was a
(40) self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the
  center of her own subjective universe rather than a
  satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In
  justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish
  repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute
(45) monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the
  self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual
  person. Cavendish’s successors among early
  feminists retained her notion of woman’s sovereign
  self, but they also sought to break free from the
(50) complete political and social isolation that her
  absolute singularity entailed.


题目:

The author of the passage refers to Robert Filmer (see line 9) primarily in order to

选项:

A、show that Royalist ideology was somewhat more radical than most historians appear to realize
B、qualify the claim that patriarchalism formed the basis of Royalist ideology
C、question the view that most early feminists were associated with the Royalist faction
D、highlight an apparent tension between Royalist ideology and the ideas of early feminists
E、argue that Royalists held conflicting opinions on issues of family organization and women’s political rights

答案:

D

提问:

请唐老师讲解一下这题,谢谢。首先如何定位句子?我选的A,定位在人名的那句话,感觉就是提及人名的目的在于解释radical patriarchalism,A和B中选
评分: 0
浏览: 3773

提问:

为什么不选C呢?第一段中刚好阐述玩Filmer 这个人的观点,就提到有历史学家的question质疑了呀
评分: 1
浏览: 5951

提问:

E和D比较可以用范围吗,
评分: 1
浏览: 6033

提问:

请教英吉老师,这道题我理解了,借此题的平台问问,line 18-25行那一整句,支撑观点的方式是什么?尤其是分号开始的 and indeed后面,是以什么方式支撑观点的?
评分: 0
浏览: 6159

提问:

这道题问了一个例子的作用,这个例子,然后根据文章脉络读这个例子支持的论点。 然后我读到了例子前一句说了一个事实,这个例子是since打头,例子后半句说:因此历史学家诧异于一个事实xxxxx。 这个时候我不知道该往上读还是往下读,做题过程中我觉得例子是一个原因,in order to引出后半句“历史学家们诧异xxx”,因此往后读了,没有选对,选了E。 不知道哪里做的不够好,希望老师指出。辛苦了! 另外:想请问老师,当遇到这种比较难的社科类文章,又出现比较多的不同人物的观点句“A claimed that...”,“B argues that...”,“C insisted that...” 扫读原文把握观点和脉络的时候,该如何正确判断哪些要读,哪些不需要读? 问题比较多,谢谢老师!
评分: 0
浏览: 6169

提问:

请老师讲一下文章结构吧,这篇文章看不太懂。
评分: 0
浏览: 6172
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询