Sentence Correction
试题详情
题目：
A Harvard anthropologist has proposed that using fire to cook
food could be dated back to almost two million years and that
it could explain hominid features like having a large brain and
small teeth.
选项:
A、using fire to cook food could be dated back to almost two million years and that it could explain hominid features like having
B、the use of fire to cook food could date back almost two million years and could explain such hominid features as
C、cooking food with fire could date back to almost two million Years, explaining hominid features like
D、fire used to cook food could date back almost two million years ,explaining hominid features such as having.
E、fire used for cooking food could be dated back to almost two million years and explain hominid features like.
答案:
B
提问：
请TINA老师解答，老师这个题目里面a选项的using fire to cook是动名词，表示用火做饭这件事，b选项里the use of fire to cook，也表示用火做饭，但重点是火。我觉得用动名词更能表示出动作，但为什么答案用的是the，use of fire呢？请老师讲一下动名词和名词的具体用法及区别
评分:
0
浏览:
7484
提问：
答案是B，错选了D。第一次做的时候选的B，隔了一段时间再做选了D。听录音说D是火被追溯到多少年以前，可是我读的是火用来做饭这件事被追溯到多少年，不知道该怎么把握类似这种名词+修饰语+动词的句子，麻烦老师讲解。
评分:
0
浏览:
7403
提问：
因为觉得用火做饭应该是被追溯，于是上来就杀了BCD。E后半句什么解释了人的特征没有交代清楚，于是选了A。听了之前的录音，还是不太明白，请老师再讲下。
评分:
0
浏览:
7347
提问：
这道题通过比较，语义强调的是使用火这个行为可以追溯到什么时候，而非火本身，因此把DE排除
比较ABC的时候发现A中有一个it，不如BC那么明确，就留下BC
BC差距主要在，the use of fire to cook和cooking with fire，date back有没有to，以及could explain和explaining
但是这三处区别我都比不出来，就选了个C
评分:
-1
浏览:
7412
