Sentence Correction
试题详情
题目：
Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
选项:
A、Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are
B、Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
C、Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
D、Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
E、Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
答案:
A
提问：
Tina老师！您要是看到这道题就大概明白我的问题了，我是那个在前面问了那个chicago and calumet rivers 问了一大堆问题的学生！！这题的A不就是有种因果感吗？这种因果感放到河的那题里不是很有歧义嘛。本来这题我是可以秒做对的，但是在经历了各种奇怪的题以后，我现在对这题也不敢选了(>﹏<)我觉得D的，ing伴随表示他们收集了一堆知识所以造成了可以draw conclusion的结果也挺对的呀？
评分:
0
浏览:
6558
提问：
老师，我错选D,我的解题思路是这样的，首先根据句子结构，排除B\C, and应该连接两个完整的句子，但这两个选项都缺少谓语，剩下的选项就找不到很明确的考点了。我听og精讲有提到通过判断句子重点来选择，但是判断句子重点一直是我很不敏感的事情，要怎样解决呢？另外，如果不通过判断句子重点，有其他考点来判断吗？这道题的正向解题思路应该是怎样的呢？谢谢老师！
评分:
0
浏览:
6564
提问：
答案A，我选的D。OG说D的时态有错误，不明白时态怎么错。另外那个“over the past twenty years”的位置放在哪里是不是都可以呢？我选D是因为觉得得到结论是积累知识带来的结果，所以选了ing伴随
评分:
1
浏览:
6546
