还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
文章：
A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.
题目：
Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?
选项:
A、Projected increases in the price of gasoline will increase the cost of taking a private vehicle into the city.The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.
B、Most of the people currently riding the bus do not own private vehicles.
C、Many commuters opposing the mayor's plan have indicated that they would rather endure trafficcongestion than pay a five-dollar-per day fee.
D、During the average workday, private vehicles owned and operated by people living within the city account for twenty percent of the city's traffic congestion.
答案:
B
提问：
原文逻辑链是对私家车收费高于公交车车费会使人们转变交通工具，使用公交车，我一开始选了a，觉得油价上涨是人们使用公交车另一个原因，排除b原因是这是过去事情，文章结论是讲未来，请问王文静老师，我的思路哪有问题？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1759
提问：
原文逻辑链是对私家车收费高于公交车车费会使人们转变交通工具，使用公交车，我一开始选了a，觉得油价上涨是人们使用公交车另一个原因，排除b原因是这是过去事情，文章结论是讲未来，请问王文静老师，我的思路哪有问题？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1760
提问：
文章逻辑链其实很明确，但是我就是不能理解为啥d 不对。
解答：
点赞0
阅读1800
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
