还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In an experiment, volunteers walked individually through a dark, abandoned theater. Half of the volunteers had been told that the theater was haunted and the other half that it was under renovation. The first half reported significantly more unusual experiences than the second did. The researchers concluded that reports of encounters with ghosts and other supernatural entities generally result from prior expectations of such experiences.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the researchers' reasoning?
选项:
A、
A. None of the volunteers in the second half believed that the unusual experiences they reported were supernatural.
B、
B. All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers' statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.
C、
C. Before being told about the theater, the volunteers within each group varied considerably in their prior beliefs about supernatural experiences.
D、
D. Each unusual experience reported by the volunteers had a cause that did not involve the supernatural.
E、
E. The researchers did not believe that the theater was haunted.
答案:
B
提问：
您好，这道题目想要请王文静老师来回答一下，我是之前广州班的学生，实在不好意思又问了一道没有人问的简单题但是我真的想不懂。这个题目我选择了Before being told about the theater, the volunteers within each group varied considerably in their prior beliefs about supernatural experiences.我觉得这个答案：All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers` statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.是一个抬杠类型的选项，原文说第一组的人被告知说这里面有鬼，选项说他们不信，这难道不是抬杠吗，这不是直接驳斥了论据而不是驳斥逻辑链？我觉得我选的这个正好提供了一个他因解释：这些人在进入电影院之前就已经根据他们是否相信超自然现象分组了，我后来想了想觉得这个选项是不是有gap就是他也没有说哪个组相信哪个组不相信所以她就错了，但是正确选项我感觉就是抬杠类型的选项。感谢老师的耐心解答!
解答：
点赞0
阅读1160
提问：
您好，这道题目想要请王文静老师来回答一下，我是之前广州班的学生，实在不好意思又问了一道没有人问的简单题但是我真的想不懂。这个题目我选择了Before being told about the theater, the volunteers within each group varied considerably in their prior beliefs about supernatural experiences.我觉得这个答案：All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers` statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.是一个抬杠类型的选项，原文说第一组的人被告知说这里面有鬼，选项说他们不信，这难道不是抬杠吗，这不是直接驳斥了论据而不是驳斥逻辑链？我觉得我选的这个正好提供了一个他因解释：这些人在进入电影院之前就已经根据他们是否相信超自然现象分组了，我后来想了想觉得这个选项是不是有gap就是他也没有说哪个组相信哪个组不相信所以她就错了，但是正确选项我感觉就是抬杠类型的选项。感谢老师的耐心解答!
解答：
点赞0
阅读1161
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
