还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Ethnohistoric documents from sixteenth-century Mexico suggesting that weaving and cooking were the most common productive activities for Aztec women may lead modern historians to underestimate the value of women's contributions to Aztec society.  Since weaving and cooking occurred mostly (but not entirely) in a domestic setting, modern historians are likely to apply to the Aztec culture the modern Western distinction between "private" and "public" production.  Thus, the ethnohistoric record conspires with Western culture to foster the view that women's production was not central to the demographic, economic, and political structures in sixteenth-century Mexico.
 
A closer examination of Aztec culture indicates that treating Aztec women's production in Mexico in such a manner would be a mistake.  Even if the products of women's labor did not circulate beyond the household, such products were essential to population growth.  Researchers document a tenfold increase in the population of the valley of Mexico during the previous four centuries, an increase that was crucial to the developing Aztec political economy.  Population growth--which could not have occurred in the absence of successful household economy, in which women's work was essential--made possible the large-scale development of labor-intensive chinampa (ridged-field) agriculture in the southern valley of Mexico which, in turn, supported urbanization and political centralization in the Aztec capital.
 
But the products of women's labor did in fact circulate beyond the household.  Aztec women wove cloth, and cloth circulated through the market system, the tribute system, and the redistributive economy of the palaces.  Cotton mantles served as a unit of currency in the regional market system.  Quantities of woven mantles, loincloths, blouses, and skirts were paid as tribute to local lords and to imperial tax stewards and were distributed to ritual and administrative personnel, craft specialists, warriors, and other faithful servants of the state.  In addition, woven articles of clothing served as markers of social status and clothing fulfilled a symbolic function in political negotiation.  The cloth that was the product of women's work thus was crucial as a primary means of organizing the flow of goods and services that sustained the Aztec state.

题目:

The passage is primarily concerned with

选项:

A、using modern understanding of cultural bias to challenge ethnohistoric documents
B、evaluating competing descriptions of women's roles in Aztec society
C、comparing the influence of gender on women's roles in Aztec society and in modern society
D、remedying a potential misconception about the significance of women's roles in Aztec society
E、applying new evidence in a reevaluation of ethnohistoric documents

答案:

D

提问:

文章我读成这样: 文章主旨: ·一些人种的资料记载导致历史学家低估了女性对于A社会的贡献 ·这些人种历史资料促成了一个观点:女性对于经济等不重要 ·然而最近的一个考察表明以这种方式对待墨西哥的女性的生产是不对的 ·墨西哥女性的生产还是很重要的 到第二段的时候我都觉得文章逻辑思路很清楚,第二段反驳了历史学家的做法,认为其方法不对。 然后说女性的生产很重要对于人口增长...后面一堆细节说怎么重要。全都读了首句一点跳过了。 重点是第三段,首句but这里,但是女性的劳动产品其实超出了家庭之外。我读到这里实在不知道文章的逻辑走向了,觉得是又把第二段的观点给反驳了,因为段间关系出不来尝试往后读发现全是细节。然后就不知道第三段到底在干什么因为女性劳动产品超出家庭之外不知道如何与前面联系起来。我随后在第二段找发现第二段第二句说了even if 劳动产品都没有超出家庭范围。所以就判定为反驳了第二段。最后留的是B和E,因为没有读出补正一个错误的观念的逻辑就直接把D排除了。因为E是评价历史记录肯定不对,就选了B。 想请张惠雯老师帮忙解答!

解答:

点赞0
阅读2145
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

文章我读成这样: 文章主旨: ·一些人种的资料记载导致历史学家低估了女性对于A社会的贡献 ·这些人种历史资料促成了一个观点:女性对于经济等不重要 ·然而最近的一个考察表明以这种方式对待墨西哥的女性的生产是不对的 ·墨西哥女性的生产还是很重要的 到第二段的时候我都觉得文章逻辑思路很清楚,第二段反驳了历史学家的做法,认为其方法不对。 然后说女性的生产很重要对于人口增长...后面一堆细节说怎么重要。全都读了首句一点跳过了。 重点是第三段,首句but这里,但是女性的劳动产品其实超出了家庭之外。我读到这里实在不知道文章的逻辑走向了,觉得是又把第二段的观点给反驳了,因为段间关系出不来尝试往后读发现全是细节。然后就不知道第三段到底在干什么因为女性劳动产品超出家庭之外不知道如何与前面联系起来。我随后在第二段找发现第二段第二句说了even if 劳动产品都没有超出家庭范围。所以就判定为反驳了第二段。最后留的是B和E,因为没有读出补正一个错误的观念的逻辑就直接把D排除了。因为E是评价历史记录肯定不对,就选了B。 想请张惠雯老师帮忙解答!

解答:

点赞0
阅读2146
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

D感觉谈了很多细节,为什么还能做主旨呢!?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2167
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询