还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         Most attempts by physicists to send particles
  faster than the speed of light involve a remarkable
  phenomenon called quantum tunneling, in which
  particles travel through solid barriers that appear
(5) to be impenetrable. If you throw a ball at a wall,
  you expect it to bounce back, not to pass straight
  through it. Yet subatomic particles perform the
  equivalent feat. Quantum theory says that there is a
  distinct, albeit small, probability that such a particle
(10) will tunnel its way through a barrier; the probability
  declines exponentially as the thickness of the
  barrier increases. Though the extreme rapidity of
  quantum tunneling was noted as early as 1932,
  not until 1955 was it hypothesized—by Wigner and
(15) Eisenbud—that tunneling particles sometimes
  travel faster than light. Their grounds were
  calculations that suggested that the time it takes a
  particle to tunnel through a barrier increases with
  the thickness of the barrier until tunneling time
(20) reaches a maximum; beyond that maximum,
  tunneling time stays the same regardless of
  barrier thickness. This would imply that once
  maximum tunneling time is reached, tunneling
  speed will increase without limit as barrier thickness
(25) increases. Several recent experiments have
  supported this hypothesis that tunneling particles
  sometimes reach superluminal speed. According to
  measurements performed by Raymond Chiao and
  colleagues, for example, photons can pass through
(30) an optical filter at 1.7 times the speed of light.


题目:

The author of the passage mentions calculations about tunneling time and barrier thickness in order to

选项:

A、suggest that tunneling time is unrelated to barrier thickness
B、explain the evidence by which Wigner and Eisenbud discovered the phenomenon of tunneling
C、describe data recently challenged by Raymond Chiao and colleagues
D、question why particles engaged in quantum tunneling rarely achieve extremely high speeds
E、explain the basis for Wigner and Eisenbud’s hypothesis

答案:

E

提问:

老师这道题B和E有什么区别?

解答:

点赞1
阅读1944
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

老师这道题B和E有什么区别?

解答:

点赞1
阅读1945
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

老师您好,我不是想问这道题,想问文章的逻辑链,请老师帮我看看我总结的逻辑链有没有什么问题: 全文主要在解释一个q t的现象,分为三个部分:1.现象的定义和原理解释 2.W和E这两个人的理论和证据 3.关于q t的最新研究 具体逻辑链:1.q t:原理:speed>light & through the barrier 补充:thickness高,through难 2.W、E:speed>light calculation证明: thickness高,time长, time到max,speed无限制 3.新研究:支持speed>light R C 例证 我会不会读文章读的太细? 麻烦老师讲一下您读这篇文章时的逻辑思路,非常感谢!

解答:

点赞0
阅读1937
解答: 郭培月老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询