还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         Because the framers of the United States
  Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting
  property rights relating to inventions would encourage
  the new nation’s economic growth, they gave
(5) Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional
  mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting
  patent system has served as a model for those in
  other nations. Recently, however, scholars have
  questioned whether the American system helped
(10) achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have
  contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American
  inventors were unable to enforce property rights
  because judges were “antipatent” and routinely
  invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This
(15) argument is based partly on examination of court
  decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”)
  brought suit alleging infringement of their patent
  rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent
  of verdicts were decided against the patentee.
(20) The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to
  increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars
  that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began
  shifting then.
       Not all patent disputes in the early nineteenth
(25) century were litigated, however, and litigated
  cases were not drawn randomly from the
  population of disputes. Therefore the rate of
  verdicts in favor of patentees cannot be used
  by itself to gauge changes in judicial attitudes
(30) or enforceability of patent rights. If early judicial
  decisions were prejudiced against patentees, one
  might expect that subsequent courts—allegedly
  more supportive of patent rights—would reject
  the former legal precedents. But pre-1830
(35) cases have been cited as frequently as later
  decisions, and they continue to be cited today,
  suggesting that the early decisions, many of
  which clearly declared that patent rights were
  a just recompense for inventive ingenuity,
(40) provided a lasting foundation for patent law.
  The proportion of judicial decisions in favor of
  patentees began to increase during the 1830s
  because of a change in the underlying population
  of cases brought to trial. This change was partly
(45) due to an 1836 revision to the patent system:
  an examination procedure, still in use today, was
  instituted in which each application is scrutinized
  for its adherence to patent law. Previously,
  patents were automatically granted upon payment
(50) of a $30 fee.


题目:

The passage implies that which of the following was a reason that the proportion of verdicts in favor of patentees began to increase in the 1830s?

选项:

A、Patent applications approved after 1836 were more likely to adhere closely to patent law.
B、Patent laws enacted during the 1830s better defined patent rights.
C、Judges became less prejudiced against patentees during the 1830s.
D、After 1836, litigated cases became less representative of the population of patent disputes.
E、The proportion of patent disputes brought to trial began to increase after 1836.

答案:

A

提问:

我定位到21行后面的suggest,错选c。是因为本题问的是作者的态度而不是学者的态度吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读1720
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

能再麻烦张慧雯老师讲一下这篇的脉络吗?这篇文章看懂就好难T^T看懂了题里还全是陷阱啊,比如这道题我觉得E也对啊

解答:

点赞1
阅读1620
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

我定位到21行后面的suggest,错选c。是因为本题问的是作者的态度而不是学者的态度吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读1721
解答: 张慧雯老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询