还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

题目:

Which of the following is true about Martin's theory, as that theory is described in the passage?

选项:

A、It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.
B、It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.
C、It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.
D、It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.
E、It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.

答案:

B

提问:

没有找到定位,我自己的定位是在第二行到第九行那句话,不知道该选哪一个

解答:

点赞0
阅读3512
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

有一个做阅读时候看文章的困惑 当看的太过于细致的时候感觉不一定就考到而且浪费时间 有时候还会混淆视听;但是看不全看不细致的时候发现选项给出额外信息时候无法排除 求问老师到底该将原文看到一个什么程度?笔记该不该含一些关键的细节点 如何判断一个细节点关键否?多谢

解答:

点赞1
阅读3520
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

错选A 但是发现了一个很大的阅读问题麻烦老师点化一下:就是每次看自己的逻辑图点也很全 然后也能看清题目问什么 有时候定位点对但是就是做不对题目, 有的时候是读不出原文究竟是想对应哪个选项的意思 ,有的时候是排除过后感觉剩下的几个也都还可以挺像的然后就选错了不知道怎么看选项. 有的人说抓主干大意但有的时候感觉根据大意又排不出来,而且有时候定位不全 麻烦老师解答一下该怎么改善噢 thx

解答:

点赞0
阅读3511
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

没有找到定位,我自己的定位是在第二行到第九行那句话,不知道该选哪一个

解答:

点赞0
阅读3513
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

这道题我留下了A和B。 A:文章中6-7行,SK说“没有证据表明P这个东西狩猎大型生物,导致大型生物灭绝。” 这不就是说Martin认为大型生物灭绝跟P狩猎有关么。跟选项A的意思沾边儿 B:文中说“Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation”。这说明Martin把气候变化导致灭绝这个因素排除了。感觉B也挺对的。 两个选项该怎么判断?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3501
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

没有找到文中定位

解答:

点赞0
阅读3495
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

一直没有好好解答过这道题。。 应该定位哪里?。。我选的是C,希望老师能把这题比较透彻的说一下,谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读3539
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

老师麻烦看一眼ID379,请问类试题什么时候按题目定位?什么时候按主题题做?谢谢!

解答:

点赞0
阅读3554
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询