还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, a significant percentage of which are quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. However, a zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.
Which of the following hypotheses receives the strongest support from the information given?
选项:
A、The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo employees is lower than that among the general population.
B、Zoo employees tend to develop animal-induced allergies that are more serious than those of other people who spend equally large amounts of time with animals.
C、Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than is exposure to the kinds of animals that are kept in zoos.
D、There is no occupation for which the risk of developing an animal-induced allergy is higher than 30 percent.
E、Among members of the general population who have spent as much time with animals as zoo employees typically have, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is significantly more than 30 percent.
答案:
E
提问：
这题不是支持题啊，感觉像归纳题，博小智录音一个选A，一个选E，还是没明白？
解答：
点赞0
阅读3164
提问：
这题不是支持题啊，感觉像归纳题，博小智录音一个选A，一个选E，还是没明白？
解答：
点赞0
阅读3165
提问：
本题问的是原文支持哪个假设，还是选项支持原文？E选项不理解。
解答：
点赞0
阅读3162
提问：
在A和E之间徘徊了。
解答：
点赞0
阅读3194
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
