还没有登录哦！
[Two-part Analysis]
试题详情
题目：
Professor A: The aid industry should begin to limit its efforts to spending on primary schools in the poorest areas, providing medicines and other basic supplies for health care such as mosquito nets, and to a few key agricultural initiatives.
Professor B: Much education work has been ineffective. A village or town with poor schooling may be better off getting a road than a teacher. Once local farmers can transport produce to market they will be willing to pay for schools-and to make sure the schools succeed.
Suppose that the professors’ statements express their genuine opinions. Select statements (1) and (2) as follows: Professor A would likely disagree with (1) and Professor B would take (2) to present logical support for (1).Select only two statements, one per column.
选项:
A、The aid industry should focus less on the areas of health and agriculture than it now does.
B、The aid industry should focus more on primary education than it now dose.
C、The aid industry should focus its spending less on primary education than it now dose.
D、Projects in health and agriculture are more likely to be successful if they not paid for by the aid industry.
E、Projects in education are more likely to be successful if they are paid by the aid industry.
F、Projects in education are more likely to be successful if they are paid by local people
答案:
C F
提问：
不明白为什么第一个选C，题目里面那个Professor A是主张削减小学教育的费用的，可是答案C也是主张削减教育费用的，为什么两者成了不同意关系？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1358
提问：
不明白为什么第一个选C，题目里面那个Professor A是主张削减小学教育的费用的，可是答案C也是主张削减教育费用的，为什么两者成了不同意关系？
解答：
点赞0
阅读1359
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
