还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin, the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era, can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However, anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them. Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still, Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians, arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere. But, according to historian Richard White, even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species, and Krech, though aware that the dates are controversial, does not challenge them; yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago.

题目:

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech's objections to Martin's theory?

选项:

A、Further studies showing that the climatic change that occurred at the end of the Pleistocene era was even more severe and widespread than was previously believed
B、New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct
C、Additional evidence indicating that widespread climatic change occurred not only at the end of the Pleistocene era but also in previous and subsequent eras
D、Researchers' discoveries that many more species became extinct in North America at the end of the Pleistocene era than was previously believed
E、New discoveries establishing that both the arrival of humans in North America and the wave of Pleistocene extinctions took place much earlier than 11,000 years ago

答案:

B

提问:

1:看完题目后,发现问的是削弱K对M提出理论的反对 由于文章是先说M的观点再说K 的 所以读后面K 的观点。 2:浏览文章,从However,anthropologist Shepard Krech…… …… 读到了后面的at the end of the Pleistocene. 3: 大致记了一下所读内容回原文对比选项 ADE的的内容不符 排除 剩下的BC中 我当时做,觉得文章中我读到的最后一句话说道了温度变化时间的问题就选了C。想问问老师C选项为什么不对。 4:另外我还想问问 根据这道题的题目,我用了逻辑的沾边原则排除选项,而没用阅读的内容沾边做 这样的思路是不是错的?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3872
解答: sysadmin

提问:

主要是BC选项,答案给的B我理解不了,我觉得选C,因为文中说K反对M理论排除了气候因素,K认为主要是气候影响,因为在end of Plei..发生了气候变化,C选项说 不止那一次气候变化,之前也发生过,正好削弱。而B选项说的小动物的部分,主要Nor 那句没太看懂,能帮助理解吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读845
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

请问张慧雯老师,本题可以理解B选项,对C选项还有疑问,Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. 克雷奇还反驳了马丁将气候变化排除在外的解释他断言世纪末确实发生了大范围的气候变化。C选项其他证据表明,大范围的气候变化不仅发生在更新世末期,而且发生在以前和以后的时代,这里是不是变相支持了K的反对,但是问题问的是削弱K的反对。

解答:

点赞0
阅读2489
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

老师这道题我选的E,不是说weaken K 对M的反对观点吗,可B不是说pale这些人他们用一些灭绝了的小动物植物,那不是就support了吗,我这样想错哪里了

解答:

点赞0
阅读3965
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

这题在BC中纠结。最后选错了。不明白正确的思路应该是怎么样的?因为有句presumably (not all) through human consumption所以觉得B选项不太准确没有很强的削弱K,就选了C。。。。

解答:

点赞0
阅读3882
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

这种题是当做逻辑题来做么?‘ B选项没太看懂,我选的是C,希望老师讲一下做题思路,谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读3923
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

1:看完题目后,发现问的是削弱K对M提出理论的反对 由于文章是先说M的观点再说K 的 所以读后面K 的观点。 2:浏览文章,从However,anthropologist Shepard Krech…… …… 读到了后面的at the end of the Pleistocene. 3: 大致记了一下所读内容回原文对比选项 ADE的的内容不符 排除 剩下的BC中 我当时做,觉得文章中我读到的最后一句话说道了温度变化时间的问题就选了C。想问问老师C选项为什么不对。 4:另外我还想问问 根据这道题的题目,我用了逻辑的沾边原则排除选项,而没用阅读的内容沾边做 这样的思路是不是错的?

解答:

点赞0
阅读3873
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询