还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
A new law gives ownership of patents—documents providing exclusive right to make and sell an invention—to universities, not the government, when those patents result from government-sponsored university research. Administrators at Logos University plan to sell any patents they acquire to corporations in order to fund programs to improve undergraduate teaching.
Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the viability of the college administrators’ plan described above?
Which of the following, if true, would cast the most doubt on the viability of the college administrators’ plan described above?
选项:
A、Profit-making corporations interested in developing products based on patents held by universities are likely to try to serve as exclusive sponsors of ongoing university research projects.
B、Corporate sponsors of research in university facilities are entitled to tax credits under new federal tax-code guidelines.
C、Research scientists at Logos University have few or no teaching responsibilities and participate little if at all in the undergraduate programs in their field.
D、Government-sponsored research conducted at Logos University for the most part duplicates research already completed by several profit-making corporations.
E、Logos University is unlikely to attract corporate sponsorship of its scientific research.
答案:
D
提问：
为什么答案是D
解答：
点赞0
阅读4703
提问：
想选E 文章的链条不是大学卖专利给公司，然后拿钱。 E就说卖不出去，吸引不了公司。不就强有力的驳斥了原文？ 感觉D没有E说的更直白啊。请老师解答。
解答：
点赞1
阅读4808
提问：
老师我不懂为什么E不对。E说学校的research不太可能吸引公司投资，那不就是说公司不愿意购买吗？D选项中是说学校项目跟世面上的一样，那也不代表学校就一定卖不出去呀
解答：
点赞-1
阅读4832
提问：
老师这题选项比较长，在时间压迫下我根本读不完读不懂怎么办？就比如A选项我就没读懂，然后排除了BCE，最后就选了A
解答：
点赞1
阅读4895
提问：
老师，我能够理解D选项，但是不太清楚E选项的错误在哪里，原文不就是说的关于公司要不要去买这些patent吗？为什么我看到og对E的解释是应该是government-sponsored而不是company。表示对这个解释有点不理解
解答：
点赞0
阅读4717
提问：
老师，我对此题目的c选项有疑问，如果老师对教学没有责任，那么不管有没有赞助都不能够提高质量，所以c为什么不对啊？
解答：
点赞0
阅读4725
提问：
为什么答案是D
解答：
点赞0
阅读4704
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
