还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Pharmacists recently conducted a study with respect to the reasons their customers purchased eye drops to soothe eye dryness. Dry eyes were more frequently experienced by customers who wore contact lenses than by customers who did not wear contact lenses. The pharmacists concluded that wearing contact lenses, by itself, can cause contact wearers to have dry eyes.
Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermines the pharmacists’ conclusion?
Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermines the pharmacists’ conclusion?
选项:
A、A. An inherited condition can cause both weak eyesight and dry eyes.
B、B. Physical exertion causes dry eyes in many people who wear contact lenses.
C、C. Most people who have dry eyes do not wear contact lenses.
D、D. Most people who wear contact lenses do not have dry eyes.
E、E. Both weak vision and dry eyes cause headaches.
答案:
A
提问：
C为什么不能驳斥呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读5218
提问：
C为什么不能驳斥呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读5219
提问：
老师 我逻辑题很糟糕，逻辑链从上完基础课后一直练也找过老师一对一还是有问题，请看下我的症结在哪。这道题我觉得就是干眼症多发于戴隐形的。所以原文结论是带隐形眼镜导致干眼。我做题时紧张了inherited没有想到什么意思。直接看到D，如果D说的对，那就证明原文里反映干眼的其实是带隐形的一部分人不是大多数。大多数没有干眼。我还觉得能推理。您看如果我如此做题症结在哪？抛开生词我多积累，真做题时遇到类似情况怎么办？逻辑链哪里退到错了？对于预判正确答案的逻辑链应该是怎样的？谢谢
解答：
点赞0
阅读5223
提问：
原文的那个人的结论是，带那个lense，它itself可以导致眼睛干，问驳斥，A说一个遗传可以引起视力不好，和干，有点驳的意思，B说physical的一个什么可以造成这帮人眼睛干，也有点意思，两个选项就不知道怎么辨别了，蒙的A
解答：
点赞0
阅读5217
提问：
选的时候在A 和 B之间犹豫
解答：
点赞0
阅读5212
提问：
文章的结论不是说戴隐形眼镜导致眼干，然后驳斥吗？A是怎么驳斥的呢,c为什么不对
解答：
点赞0
阅读5223
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
