写了 帮忙看下The argument is based on many doubtful assumptions and inadequate deductions, making the argument unconvincing and vulnerable. The argument that, because City L was listed 14th in a survey, people moving to the state where City L belongs will confidently have one place where schools are good, housing is affordable, people are friendly and both environment and arts are good, omits many important aspects that needed to be addressed to substantiate the argument. The fact that City L was listed 14th serve merely as a fact per se that does not form a logical argument in favor of the main argument neither does it support or buttress the main argument. First off, the author takes for granted that a survey of quality of life reflects the quality of schools, affordability of housing, kindness of people, and many other aspects. The author many overlook the possibility that such survey did not get into these details and that it was ranked based on a vague impression, or that the city's overall ranking is good but overall ranking does not reflect the quality of each individual facilities, for example, schools are good but the people is not kind.Second, the author did not address the scope of the cities that are included in this survey, making it really hard to measure the level of quality. If this survey is about developing cities, the confidence of finding at least one place offering all the aspects listed in the passage will be compromised.Also, the author did not address the people participating. Quality of life is really a subjective opinion; one man's bad can be another man's perfection. so the author needs to address the benchmark if he wants to make this argument more appealing. Finally, City L was listed 14th two years ago. Two years is a long time, and basing conclusion on an out-of-date survey really adds many uncertainties into the conclusion.

写了 帮忙看下The argument is based on many doubtful assumptions and inadequate deductions, making the argument unconvincing and vulnerable. The argument that, because City L was listed 14th in a survey, people moving to the state where City L belongs will confidently have one place where schools are good, housing is affordable, people are friendly and both environment and arts are good, omits many important aspects that needed to be addressed to substantiate the argument. The fact that City L was listed 14th serve merely as a fact per se that does not form a logical argument in favor of the main argument neither does it support or buttress the main argument. First off, the author takes for granted that a survey of quality of life reflects the quality of schools, affordability of housing, kindness of people, and many other aspects. The author many overlook the possibility that such survey did not get into these details and that it was ranked based on a vague impression, or that the city's overall ranking is good but overall ranking does not reflect the quality of each individual facilities, for example, schools are good but the people is not kind.Second, the author did not address the scope of the cities that are included in this survey, making it really hard to measure the level of quality. If this survey is about developing cities, the confidence of finding at least one place offering all the aspects listed in the passage will be compromised.Also, the author did not address the people participating. Quality of life is really a subjective opinion; one man's bad can be another man's perfection. so the author needs to address the benchmark if he wants to make this argument more appealing. Finally, City L was listed 14th two years ago. Two years is a long time, and basing conclusion on an out-of-date survey really adds many uncertainties into the conclusion.