还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild.  The countries in which the tigers' habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting.  Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
 
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

选项:

A、assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B、considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species
C、fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers
D、neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting
E、takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival

答案:

E

提问:

老师,这种题怎么找相关和无关选项呢

解答:

点赞0
阅读2472
解答: sysadmin

提问:

想问一下胡凡老师根据这个题目,可以判断它是一个归纳题对吧。另外对于增强题、削弱题,如果出现了那种重复原文的那种选项,也直接排除对吧

解答:

点赞1
阅读2632
解答: 胡凡老师

提问:

听其他录音听到一个陌生词汇,指出原文逻辑错误的题,这个好像上课没讲过,以前的录音把题型还是分类了,现在是不分了么?是不是CR只有归纳演绎两个大类?指出原文逻辑错误的题是演绎题么?但是听过一个录音说指出原文逻辑错误的题说的比较虚,没有涉及原文具体内容,反之就是演绎题,这怎么理解? 下面这题录音有的说是老管说指出原文逻辑错误的题,应该找重述原文的选项,但是正确选项也有可能指出原文没说过但是应该说的相关东西啊? 老英的录音又说是演绎题,为什么回答不一样?这怎么理解?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2495
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

老师,这种题怎么找相关和无关选项呢

解答:

点赞0
阅读2473
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument 。 ARGUMENT中的原因对于评论最脆弱的是。。不知道问的是什么,题目不懂就不知道方向了

解答:

点赞0
阅读2542
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询