还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

    Two opposing scenarios, the "arboreal" hypothesis and the "cursorial" hypothesis, have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The "arboreal" hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing frees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers: the height of trees provides a good starting place for launching flight, especially through gliding. As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes intuitive Sense, but certain aspects are Troubling. Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but no convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than a few meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

    The "cursorial"(running) hypothesis holds that small dinosaurs ran along the ground and stretched out their arms for balance as they leaped into the air after insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even rudimentary feathers on forelimbs could have expanded the arm's surface area to enhance lift slightly. Larger feathers could have increased lift incrementally, until sustained flight was gradually achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not provide the acceleration produced by dropping out of a tree; an animal would have to run quite fast to take off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve high speeds. The cursorial hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the immediate theropod dinosaur ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the traits needed for high lift off speeds: they were small, agile, lightly built, long-legged, and good runners. And because they were bipedal, their arms were free to evolve flapping flight, which cannot be said for other reptiles of their time.

题目:

Which of the following is included in the discussion of the cursorial hypothesis but not in the discussion of the arboreal hypothesis?

选项:

A、A discussion of some of the features of Archaeopteryx
B、A description of the environment known to have been inhabited by bird ancestors
C、A possible reason why bird ancestors might have been engaging in activities that eventually evolved into flight
D、A description of the obvious features of animals with gliding ability
E、An estimate of the amount of time it took for bird ancestors to evolve the kind of flapping flight that allowed them to become completely airborne

答案:

C

提问:

虽然做对了,但是这道题用了四分钟(不是阅读第一条、道)请问怎么读有效信息

解答:

点赞0
阅读2125
解答: sysadmin

提问:

虽然做对了,但是这道题用了四分钟(不是阅读第一条、道)请问怎么读有效信息

解答:

点赞0
阅读2126
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

此题问的是哪个在C假设中提到,而没在A假设中提到,英老师的讲解是直接读第二段第一句话,C选项涉及到C假设,就直接选了C 会不会可能既在C假设中又在A假设中,所以应该两个选项都读了

解答:

点赞0
阅读2144
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

这道题的前一道题我读的第一段Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its后面所有内容,看这道题的问题说c理论里有,a理论里没有的内容。用必要性做题,因为前一道题我已经读了a理论的大部分,我自然去选项里挑a理论里没有的。又因为我在最开始读文章逻辑脉络的时候读了第一段前两句话,所以我依据第一段前两句和Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its后面所有内容直接做题,这样就只有最后一项没有,所以就选了E。 以前的录音都是挑c理论里面有的,不知道按我的做题思路为什么选不出C。 这是我读的内容,因为很多,只是看了看大概涉及哪方面:Two opposing scenarios, the "arboreal" hypothesis and the "cursorial" hypothesis, have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The "arboreal" hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing frees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers:(中间省略没读) Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but no convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than a few meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

解答:

点赞0
阅读2100
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询