还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several wine makers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these wine makers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
选项:
A、These wine makers have been able to duplicate the preservative effect produced by adding sulfites by means that do not involve adding any potentially allergenic substances to their wine.
B、Not all forms of sulfite are equally likely to produce the allergic reactions.
C、Wine is the only beverage to which sulfites are commonly added.
D、Apart from sulfites, there are no substances commonly present in wine that give rise to an allergic reaction.
E、Sulfites are not naturally present in the wines produced by these wine makers in amounts large enough to produce an allergic reaction in someone who drinks these wines.
答案:
E
提问：
想请张慧雯老师解答一下
解答：
点赞0
阅读249
提问：
想请张慧雯老师解答一下
解答：
点赞0
阅读250
提问：
为什么不选D呢？
解答：
点赞0
阅读2855
提问：
我看老师在录播里直接把有否定的优先考虑，没有否定的不优先，这个是为啥呢，是关于假设题的比较大概率正确的解题技巧吗？？老师说下吧。。
解答：
点赞1
阅读2924
提问：
不明白A选项什么意思，什么叫加了某种亚硝酸盐但是不会包含能够引起过敏的物质？
解答：
点赞0
阅读3001
提问：
原文说很多人忍受着对S的过敏反应，包括那些通常加入到酒里面当perservative的，然而，因为有一些制酒商没有在他们生产的任何一种酒中加入S，那些喜欢喝酒但是对会S过敏的人就可以喝这些制酒商生产的酒还不要冒对S有过敏反应的险。题目问前提假设。
A：这些制酒商可以加倍由加入S产生的perservative的效力通过不加入任何潜在过敏物质到酒中。这个是说那些喝没有s的酒的人也不会过敏啊。我就留着了。
B：不是所有形式的S都同等可能性的产生过敏反应，排除。
C：酒是通常会加入S的唯一饮品，排除。
D：除了S，没有其他的物质通常出现在酒中能够引起过敏反应，我觉得这个也相关啊，留着了。
E：S不是自然出现在这些制酒商制造的酒中，总计足够大到产生过敏反应对喝了这些酒的人。读不通常，不晓得那个in amounts是怎么接的，而且感觉上是在说这些人会过敏，原文说是不会过敏，前提跟原文的方向应该一致，所以就排除掉了。
然后自己在AD中纠结，觉得D的commonly没有A的any厉害，所以选了A。
请老师讲解！多谢！
解答：
点赞-3
阅读2867
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
