还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the politician's argument?
United States politician: Although the amount of United States goods shipped to Mexico doubled in the year after tariffs on trade between the two countries were reduced, it does not follow that the reduction in tariffs caused the sales of United States goods to companies and consumers in Mexico to double that year, because __________.
选项:
A、many of the United States companies that produced goods that year had competitors based in Mexico that had long produced the same kind of goods
B、most of the increase in goods shipped by United States companies to Mexico was in parts shipped to the companies’ newly relocated subsidiaries for assembly and subsequent shipment back to the United States
C、marketing goods to a previously unavailable group of consumers is most successful when advertising specifically targets those consumers, but developing such advertising often takes longer than a year
D、the amount of Mexican goods shipped to the United States remained the same as it had been before the tariff reductions
E、there was no significant change in the employment rate in either of the countries that year
答案:
B
提问：
这道题问的是美墨两国关税下降后美运往墨的货物多了一倍但是销售额并没有多一倍的原因。我排了ADE然后选了C，我的理解是因为开发广告的时间长所以关税下降后立马在墨出售货物会造成无人问津的现象。我也知道C这么理解有点牵强但我没理解B选项的意思也不懂B怎么解释了题中的现象
解答：
点赞1
阅读446
提问：
这道题问的是美墨两国关税下降后美运往墨的货物多了一倍但是销售额并没有多一倍的原因。我排了ADE然后选了C，我的理解是因为开发广告的时间长所以关税下降后立马在墨出售货物会造成无人问津的现象。我也知道C这么理解有点牵强但我没理解B选项的意思也不懂B怎么解释了题中的现象
解答：
点赞1
阅读447
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
