还没有登录哦!

[Reading Comprehension]

试题详情

文章:

Line         It is an odd but indisputable fact that the
  seventeenth-century English women who are
  generally regarded as among the forerunners of
  modern feminism are almost all identified with the
(5) Royalist side in the conflict between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians known as the English Civil Wars.
  Since Royalist ideology is often associated with the
  radical patriarchalism of seventeenth-century
  political theorist Robert Filmer—a patriarchalism
(10) that equates family and kingdom and asserts the
  divinely ordained absolute power of the king and,
  by analogy, of the male head of the household—
  historians have been understandably puzzled by the
  fact that Royalist women wrote the earliest
(15) extended criticisms of the absolute subordination
  of women in marriage and the earliest systematic
  assertions of women’s rational and moral equality
  with men. Some historians have questioned the
  facile equation of Royalist ideology with Filmerian
(20) patriarchalism; and indeed, there may have been
  no consistent differences between Royalists and
  Parliamentarians on issues of family organization
  and women’s political rights, but in that case one
  would expect early feminists to be equally divided
(25) between the two sides.
       Catherine Gallagher argues that Royalism
  engendered feminism because the ideology of
  absolute monarchy provided a transition to an
  ideology of the absolute self. She cites the example
(30) of the notoriously eccentric author Margaret
  Cavendish (1626–1673), duchess of Newcastle.
  Cavendish claimed to be as ambitious as any
  woman could be, but knowing that as a woman she
  was excluded from the pursuit of power in the real
(35) world, she resolved to be mistress of her own
  world, the “immaterial world” that any person can
  create within her own mind—and, as a writer, on
  paper. In proclaiming what she called her
  “singularity,” Cavendish insisted that she was a
(40) self-sufficient being within her mental empire, the
  center of her own subjective universe rather than a
  satellite orbiting a dominant male planet. In
  justifying this absolute singularity, Cavendish
  repeatedly invoked the model of the absolute
(45) monarch, a figure that became a metaphor for the
  self-enclosed, autonomous nature of the individual
  person. Cavendish’s successors among early
  feminists retained her notion of woman’s sovereign
  self, but they also sought to break free from the
(50) complete political and social isolation that her
  absolute singularity entailed.


题目:

Which of the following, if true, would most clearly undermine Gallagher’s explanation of the link between Royalism and feminism?

选项:

A、Because of their privileged backgrounds, Royalist women were generally better educated than were their Parliamentarian counterparts.
B、Filmer himself had read some of Cavendish’s early writings and was highly critical of her ideas.
C、Cavendish’s views were highly individual and were not shared by the other Royalist women who wrote early feminist works.
D、The Royalist and Parliamentarian ideologies were largely in agreement on issues of family organization and women’s political rights.
E、The Royalist side included a sizable minority faction that was opposed to the more radical tendencies of Filmerian patriarchalism.

答案:

C

提问:

错选了D,因为我觉得上一段是在讲conflict,而第二段是对conflict提出解释。上一段的末尾说如果是这样的话,女性主义者会分成两派而不是支持royalist,而这一段说royalist导致女权,那么不就是说女性还是站在royalist这边,与上一段相反吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读239
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

错选了D,因为我觉得上一段是在讲conflict,而第二段是对conflict提出解释。上一段的末尾说如果是这样的话,女性主义者会分成两派而不是支持royalist,而这一段说royalist导致女权,那么不就是说女性还是站在royalist这边,与上一段相反吗?

解答:

点赞1
阅读240
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

没有找到定位

解答:

点赞0
阅读654
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

请问老师,这题的定位应该在哪里?我做的时候没有想到,此外,能不能给我讲一下这篇文章整体的脉络逻辑?

解答:

点赞0
阅读658
解答: 王文静老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询